sca-assembly

← back

159 messages · 51 threads

Thread Messages Started
RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 133: Broken links in the Assembly spec 1 2009-05-03
[ASSEMBLY 122] Incorrect Usage of MAY Keyword - Revised Proposal, Part 1 3 2009-05-04
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards 74 2009-05-04
Groups - Assembly Test WSDL XSD sample (Service1a.xsd) uploaded 1 2009-05-04
Groups - RDDL doc for 200903 NS (200903-rddl.html) uploaded 1 2009-05-05
Groups - 200903-rddl.html uploaded 1 2009-05-05
[Issue 80] - Eventing Extensions 1 2009-05-05
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified 16 2009-05-05
Re: [sca-assembly] [ASSEMBLY 122] Incorrect Usage of MAY Keyword- Revised Proposal, Part 1 2 2009-05-05
Re: [sca-assembly] [ASSEMBLY 122] Incorrect Usage of MAY Keyword - RevisedProposal, Part 1 1 2009-05-05
Intents attached to WSDL 1 2009-05-05
Draft Minutes from 2009-05-05 are attached 1 2009-05-05
Contribution of Eventing Extension Proposal 1 2009-05-06
IBM's Contribution of SCA-Assembly Extensions for Event Processing and Pub/Subspecification 1 2009-05-06
SAP's Contribution of SCA Assembly Model Specification Extensions for Event Processing and Pub/Sub V1.00 specification 1 2009-05-06
NEW ISSUE: FW: [sca-assembly-comment] Minor nit: reference to unsupported WSDL 2.0 endpoint notion? 1 2009-05-07
Assembly TestCases Complete and ready for Review 1 2009-05-08
Version Control Commit by booz 4 2009-05-08
SCA-J requesting modifications to namespace document 6 2009-05-08
NEW ISSUE: Promoting a reference with multiplicity 1..n and targetsshould default to 0..n 1 2009-05-11
ISSUE 135: Minor nit: reference to unsupported WSDL 2.0 endpoint notion? 1 2009-05-12
ISSUE 136: Promoting a reference with multiplicity 1..n and targets should default to 0..n 1 2009-05-12
Apologies 1 2009-05-12
Draft Minutes of 2009-05-12 are attached 1 2009-05-13
Test posting 1 2009-05-13
Eventing spec 2 2009-05-14
Re: [sca-assembly] Event Processing spec 1 2009-05-14
Slides for SCA Assembly? 4 2009-05-14
Response to a Question on the Openness and Structure of the SCA Assemblytest suite 1 2009-05-15
Assembly call conflict 1 2009-05-18
ASSEMBLY 132: Microsoft technical comment about the SCA Assembly Modelspecification #1 - Proposal 1 2009-05-19
Groups - CD03 + Issue 133 Word Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03_Issue133.doc) uploaded 1 2009-05-19
ASSEMBLY 133: Broken links in the Assembly spec - Proposal 1 2009-05-19
AUTO: Asokan Ramanathan is out of the office (returning 05/21/2009) 1 2009-05-19
Slides for Discussion of Assembly Testcases 1 2009-05-19
Groups - Assembly Testcases Description slides (Assembly_Testcases_Description.pdf) uploaded 1 2009-05-19
Response to: "Microsoft technical comment about the SCA Assembly Modelspecification" 1 2009-05-21
NEW ISSUE: Clarify the use of a binding name in a reference target 1 2009-05-22
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Clarify the use of a binding name in areference target 1 2009-05-22
[ISSUE 137]: Clarify the use of a binding name in a reference target -Comment on Proposal 1 2009-05-22
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 137]: Clarify the use of a binding name in areference target - Comment on Proposal 1 2009-05-22
Groups - SCA-EventingProcessing.pdf uploaded 1 2009-05-26
Formatted Minutes from 2009-05-19 are attached 1 2009-05-26
Test Assertions and TestCases that require Java 2 2009-05-27
[NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear on Contribution vs Deployment -when can errors in artifacts be reported? 1 2009-05-27
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear onContribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? 3 2009-05-27
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear on Contribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? 1 2009-05-27
Review of Test Assertions and TestCases 1 2009-05-28
Re: reviewing ASM test assertions and testcases 2 2009-05-29
Version Control Commit by baupperle 2 2009-05-29
Draft minutes of 2005-05-26 are attached 1 2009-05-31