Simon Holdsworth wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I have a question on the resolution of issue BINDINGS-44 (Update
> binding.jms spec for wireFormat/operationSelection elements)
>
> The resolution text includes introduction of new elements:
>
> <wireFormat.jmsdefault>
> <operationSelector.jmsdefault>
>
> However these are only mentioned in the text, there is no schema
> definition for these.
>
> Should there be an update to the schema to define these two elements?
> If so I'd imagine the following needs adding to the binding.jms schema:
>
> <element name="wireFormat.jmsdefault" type="sca:WireFormatType"
> substitutionGroup="sca:wireFormat"/>
> <element name="operationSelector.jmsdefault"
> type="sca:OperationSelectorType"
> substitutionGroup="sca:operationSelector"/>
>
> Also as per the naming conventions issue I suspect that these ought to
> be called:
>
> <wireFormat.jmsDefault>
> <operationSelector.jmsDefault>
>
I know the naming convention does not say anything about element/type
names that contain acronyms, but to be consistent with the convention
for intents, shouldn't acronyms in elements/types be uppercase too?
-Anish
--
> A side note: the current Assembly CD draft refers to the default JMS
> wire format as <sca:wireFormat.jms>
>
> Regards, Simon
>
> Simon Holdsworth
> STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair
> MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
> Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
> Internet -
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /
> /
>
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU/
>
>
>
>
>
>
