Anish,
Thanks for volunteering for 25.
As far as 22 ("Bindings
specifications should provide exemplary Implementations for Callbacks and
Conversations") goes, if
we remove the conversation part of it, then I agree that this is already
covered by issue 2 for web services, and I would argue that the JMS binding
spec already fully defines the callback behaviour, so that leaves 22 only
applying to JCA. Perhaps we could either close 22 and reopen a JCA-only
issue or modify the existing issue 22.
Regards, Simon
Simon Holdsworth
STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair
MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
Internet -
Anish Karmarkar <>
22/01/2009 07:53
To
cc
Subject
Re: [sca-bindings] Open Issue ownership
Simon Holdsworth wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> According to my analysis, here's the current status of ownership of
issues:
>
> Simon Holdsworth: 39, 48, 60
> Anish Karmarkar: 2, 43, ? 25 ?
I can take ownership of 25.
> Piotr Przybylski: 45, ? 29 ?
> Eric Johnson: 54, 57, 58, 59
> Bryan Aupperle: 55, ? 21 ?
> Dave Booz: ? 29 ?
> Ashok Malhotra: ? 29 ?
> Simon Nash: ? 21 ?
>
> Issues with possible owners (?) above: 21, 25, 29
> Issues with no owners: 22, 23, 24
Wrt issue 22, shouldn't this be split into three issues, or perhaps have
three owners, one for each spec. I would be happy to take ownership for
the WS spec. In fact, since conversations has been removed, for WS spec,
this reduces to issue 2 and I already am the owner of that.
-Anish
--
>
> Please let me know asap if you don't think you are able to propose
a
> resolution for the issues listed against you above some time in the
next
> 4-6 weeks, or if you would like to take on ownership of one of these:
>
> BINDINGS-21 Support for callback and conversation
ID-s in
> bindings
> BINDINGS-22 Bindings specifications should
provide exemplary
> Implementations for Callbacks and Conversations
> BINDINGS-23 @wsdlElement definition needs
clarification on
> "equivalent" and use of WSDL 2.0 constructs
> BINDINGS-24 Which wire did a message arrive
on?
> BINDINGS-25 Is it required that every
implementation of
> binding.ws support the soap intent?
> BINDINGS-29 Properties on Bindings
>
> If there are no volunteers for these then they will effectively get
> deferred beyond the 1.1 versions of the bindings specs.
>
> Regards, Simon
>
> Simon Holdsworth
> STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings
TC Chair
> MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
> Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
> Internet -
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /
> /
>
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6 3AU/
>
>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
