The original wording for the note is here:
In the case where the reference that uses a bidirectional interface cannot accept connections for callbacks from a service (for example, when it has the noListener intent [SCA-Policy]), it should support a polling mechanism. For an example of polling see [WS-MakeConnection].
Suggested re-wording of that sentence:
In the case where the reference binding that uses a bidirectional interface cannot accept connections for callbacks from a service (for example, when it has the noListener intent [SCA-Policy]), the binding implementation needs to support a polling mechanism for retrieval of callback request messages. For an example of polling see [WS-MakeConnection].
In the above 'needs to' could be changed to 'is encouraged to' and I'd still be ok with it.
Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:
Anish Karmarkar ---02/12/2009 01:41:38 AM---I accepted the changes that Mike had made in his version and then made changes agreed to during tod
From:
Anish Karmarkar <>
To:
OASIS Bindings <>
Date:
02/12/2009 01:41 AM
Subject:
[sca-bindings] Issue 2 - proposal v8
I accepted the changes that Mike had made in his version and then made
changes agreed to during today's call.
V8 is attached.
I'll send the ws-policy assertion proposal separately.
-Anish
--
[attachment "SCA-bindings-issue2-proposal-v8.doc" deleted by David Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM] ---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
