I think this is a bug. I don't know what it would mean to have a
property without a name.
-Anish
--
Simon Laws wrote:
>
> As of JMS binding spec CD02 Rev 6 the BindingProperty structure is
> defined as:
>
> 922 <complexType name="BindingProperty">
> 923 <simpleContent>
> 924 <extension base="string">
> 925 <attribute name="name" type="NMTOKEN"/>
> 926 <attribute name="type" type="string" use="optional"
> 927 default="xs:string"/>
> 928 </extension>
> 929 </simpleContent>
> 930 </complexType>
>
> Is the "name" attribute intentionally optional?
>
> If so, is it valid to have an element, such as destination, with more
> than one property with no name?
>
> Regards
>
> Simon
>
> Simon Laws
> Open Source SOA Development
> tuscany.apache.org
> Mail Point 146, Hursley Park, Winchester, Hampshire, SO21 2JN
> Tel: Internal 248708 External +44 (0)1962 818708
> Email:
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /
> /
>
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU/
>
>
>
>
>
>
