Am I missing something? From this schema it looks to me like the
"name" attribute is required and the "type" attribute is optional.
Simon
Anish Karmarkar wrote:
> I think this is a bug. I don't know what it would mean to have a
> property without a name.
>
> -Anish
> --
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
>>
>> As of JMS binding spec CD02 Rev 6 the BindingProperty structure is
>> defined as:
>>
>> 922 <complexType name="BindingProperty">
>> 923 <simpleContent>
>> 924 <extension base="string">
>> 925 <attribute name="name" type="NMTOKEN"/>
>> 926 <attribute name="type" type="string" use="optional"
>> 927 default="xs:string"/>
>> 928 </extension>
>> 929 </simpleContent>
>> 930 </complexType>
>>
>> Is the "name" attribute intentionally optional?
>>
>> If so, is it valid to have an element, such as destination, with more
>> than one property with no name?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Simon
>>
>> Simon Laws
>> Open Source SOA Development
>> tuscany.apache.org
>> Mail Point 146, Hursley Park, Winchester, Hampshire, SO21 2JN
>> Tel: Internal 248708 External +44 (0)1962 818708
>> Email:
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> /
>> /
>>
>> /Unless stated otherwise above:
>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
>> number 741598.
>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
>> 3AU/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>