Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [sca-bindings] Proposed resolution to issue BINDINGS-147
Bryan, Apologies, I've enabled line numbering. I'm not too familiar with working with ODT files, I've had a few issues with formatting. Another observation. Currently the JMS TC document TA appendix has a comment in each entry with a copy of the normative statement from the JMS spec. This was very convenient when building and reviewing the TAs, however I'm not sure that we should have these statements copied into the Test Cases document, and I expect this is not consistent with any other Test Case document. I believe we should remove these statements from the comments. Here's an updated proposal (with your requested changes, but currently without the TA comments removed): Simon Holdsworth From: Bryan Aupperle <> To: Date: 11/03/2011 19:22 Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] Proposed resolution to issue BINDINGS-147 While we are doing this, we should fix some RFC2119 related wording problems. These are now all in section A.1: There are no line numbers to use so... Prerequisites: The prerequisites *may* be defined in terms of one or more other test assertions that *must* be true. Predicate: The meat of the assertion - something that *should evaluate* to true or false for the given target. (We missed this in the POJO document) Prescription Level: Mandatory (for *MUST* requirements) or Preferred (for *SHOULD* requirements) or Permitted (for *MAY* requirements). Tags: Zero or more labels *that may* be attached to this test assertion - these tags can be used to group sets of assertions. Should changed to Prerequisites: The prerequisites *can* be defined in terms of one or more other test assertions that *have to* be true. Predicate: The meat of the assertion - something that *evaluates* to true or false for the given target. (Also fix in the POJO document) Prescription Level: Mandatory (for *"MUST"* requirements) or Preferred (for *"SHOULD"* requirements) or Permitted (for *"MAY"* requirements). Tags: Zero or more labels *to be* attached to this test assertion - these tags can be used to group sets of assertions. Bryan Aupperle. Software IT Architect - Mid-Atlantic Senior Technical Staff Member Raleigh, NC Mobile: 919-656-0018 From: Simon Holdsworth <> To: Mike Edwards <> Cc: Date: 03/11/2011 09:35 AM Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] Proposed resolution to issue BINDINGS-147 Mike, OK, I think actually I'd prefer to put the TA to TC mapping after the TAs, so we have: App A TA App B Normative statement to TA mapping App C TA to TC mapping Here's another update with the mapping section moved to an appendix, and subsections added in section 2: Simon Holdsworth STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair, AT&T and Boeing Lab Advocate MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898 Internet - From: Mike Edwards/UK/IBM@IBMGB To: Date: 11/03/2011 14:00 Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] Proposed resolution to issue BINDINGS-147 Simon, You did this really quickly and I'm impressed! It looks pretty good. A couple of comments inline below... Yours, Mike Dr Mike Edwards Mail Point 137, Hursley Park STSM Winchester, Hants SO21 2JN SCA & Services Standards United Kingdom Co-Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC IBM Software Group Phone: +44-1962 818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431 (274097) e-mail: From: Simon Holdsworth/UK/IBM@IBMGB To: Date: 11/03/2011 12:45 Subject: [sca-bindings] Proposed resolution to issue BINDINGS-147 Proposed resolution to BINDINGS-147, "Conformance Statement missing for the Web Services Binding Assertions" Please review and comment on these changes, I'd like at least some feedback on this one before I got ahead and do the web services proposal. Summary: Include test assertions content in an appendix of the test cases document; remove normative reference to TA document, update descriptive text to reference the new appendix. Detail: Here's a modified version of the JMS test cases document with the proposed changes: Comments: The resulting document has a section 3, "Cross Mapping of Test Assertions to TestCases", but then the mapping from test assertions to normative statements is in an appendix A.6 "Cross Mapping of Conformance Statements to Test Assertions", which seems inconsistent to me, I would have expected all cross-mappings to be in appendices. Also really I think that appendix title should be "Cross Mapping of Normative Statements to Test Assertions", they are not conformance statements. <mje> Agreed. We can move Section 3 into Appendix A and move the Appendix A into Appendix B ? </mje> The testCases section has a subsection "Section 3" which I assume refers to the SCA JMS Binding Specification Section 3.... in which case the Test Cases section 2 should have additional subsections relating to the SCA JMS Binding Specification Section 4, 5 and 6, as the TA Appendix does. <mje> Yes, agreed - this subsection arrangement is what we have in other testcase documents </mje> At the risk of begging extra work, it seems like all these cross mapping sections should have the mapped elements be cross-referenced in the document to enable navigation... <mje> Ahem --- that is a *lot* of extra work you're asking for. Don't go there unless you've got a spare weekend coming up... </mje> Regards, Simon Simon Holdsworth STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair, AT&T and Boeing Lab Advocate MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898 Internet - Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU [attachment "sca-jmsbinding-1.1-testcases-1.0-issue147.odt" deleted by Mike Edwards/UK/IBM] [attachment "sca-jmsbinding-1.1-testcases-1.0-issue147.pdf" deleted by Mike Edwards/UK/IBM] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU [attachment "sca-jmsbinding-1.1-testcases-1.0-issue147-v2.odt" deleted by Bryan Aupperle/Raleigh/IBM] [attachment "sca-jmsbinding-1.1-testcases-1.0-issue147-v2.pdf" deleted by Bryan Aupperle/Raleigh/IBM] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU sca-jmsbinding-1.1-testcases-1.0-issue147-v3.odt sca-jmsbinding-1.1-testcases-1.0-issue147-v3.pdf
Next in thread →
Next in month →