Anish, thanks for starting the mail discussion.
My point was that if there is enough pain in keeping chapter 4 in sync then
it should not be a problem to get a super-majority for any revision of this
motion. So the normal TC process can handle it.
Kind Regards
DK
Dieter König Mail: IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
Senior Technical Staff Member Tel (office): (+49) 7031-16-3426 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
Martin Jetter
Architect, Business Process Fax (office): (+49) 7031-16-4890 Geschäftsführung: Herbert Kircher
Choreographer
Member, Technical Expert Council Tel (home office): (+49) 7032-201464 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Schönaicher Strasse 220, 71032 Registergericht: Amtsgericht
Böblingen, Germany Stuttgart, HRB 243294
From: Anish Karmarkar <>
To: OASIS BPEL <>
Date: 31.01.2008 18:14
Subject: [sca-bpel] Issue 1 motion/amendments from today's call
Due to lack of time we tabled the main motion and amendment. Since we
did not have consensus on the amendment, I would encourage folks to
discuss this on the mailing list. We'll take this up again next week.
main motion: leave chapter 4 as-is and mark it as non-normative, keep
chapter 4 in sync with the rest of the spec
amendment: If the work of keeping chapter 4 in sync is too onerous then
we remove chapter 4 (support for BPEL 1.1)
-Anish
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
