Re: [sca-bpel] Issue 1 motion/amendments from today's call

From
Danny van der Rijn <>
Date
2008-01-31T18:25:33+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [sca-bpel] Issue 1 motion/amendments from today's call
My concern is that the super-majority bar is too high.  It allows for a
small number of people to effectively coerce the rest of the TC to at
least review and discuss changes that are made.  We should be focusing
on BPEL 2.0.  It's fine to allocate a bit of time to stay in sync with
1.1, but not at the expense of too much of our valuable time.

Danny

Dieter Koenig1 wrote:

  
  
  Re: [sca-bpel] Issue 1 motion/amendments from today's call

  
Anish, thanks for starting the mail discussion.

  

My point was that if there is enough pain in keeping chapter 4 in sync
then

it should not be a problem to get a super-majority for any revision of
this

motion. So the normal TC process can handle it.

  

Kind Regards

DK

                                                                                                                  

 Dieter König                          Mail:
         IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH     

                                                                                                                  

 Senior Technical Staff Member         Tel (office): (+49)
7031-16-3426      Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:      

                                                                            
Martin Jetter                        

                                                                                                                  

 Architect, Business Process           Fax (office): (+49)
7031-16-4890      Geschäftsführung: Herbert Kircher    

 Choreographer                                                                                                    

                                                                                                                  

 Member, Technical Expert Council      Tel (home office): (+49)
7032-201464  Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen     

                                                                                                                  

                                       Schönaicher Strasse 220,
71032        Registergericht: Amtsgericht         

                                       Böblingen,
Germany                    Stuttgart, HRB 243294                

                                                                                                                  

                                                                                                                  

                                                                                                                  

  

  

  

  

  

                                                                                                                             

  From:       Anish Karmarkar
<>                                                                   

                                                                                                                             

  To:         OASIS BPEL
<>                                                                     

                                                                                                                             

  Date:       31.01.2008
18:14                                                                                               

                                                                                                                             

  Subject:    [sca-bpel] Issue 1 motion/amendments from today's
call                                                         

                                                                                                                             

  

  

  

  

  

Due to lack of time we tabled the main motion and amendment. Since we

did not have consensus on the amendment, I would encourage folks to

discuss this on the mailing list. We'll take this up again next week.

  

main motion: leave chapter 4 as-is and mark it as non-normative, keep

chapter 4 in sync with the rest of the spec

  

amendment: If the work of keeping chapter 4 in sync is too onerous then

we remove chapter 4 (support for BPEL 1.1)

  

-Anish

--

  

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in

OASIS

at:

  https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

  

  

  

  

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS

at:

  https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

  

  
  

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature