Title: [sca-bpel] Issue 49: BPEL process QName is assumed to be unique
WS-BPEL intentionally focussed on defining exactly one process and
deliberately stayed silent on any interaction between processes.
Anish Karmarkar wrote:
This is a new issue based on a PR comment, per my
AI.
http://osoa.org/jira/browse/BPEL-49
PR 01 comment filed at:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel-comment/200906/msg00002.html
The BPEL specification does not say that the BPEL process QName is
unique. The SCA BPEL C&I spec assumes that it is, but does not state
this assumption in the spec.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
