← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Issue 49: BPEL process QName is assumed to be unique
This is a new issue based on a PR comment, per my AI. http://osoa.org/jira/browse/BPEL-49 PR 01 comment filed at: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel-comment/200906/msg00002.html The BPEL specification does not say that the BPEL process QName is unique. The SCA BPEL C&I spec assumes that it is, but does not state this assumption in the spec.
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread