Anish Karmarkar wrote:
> All of these fixed in WD05 except as noted below.
>
> -Anish
> --
>
> Mark Combellack wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Having reviewed the changes in WD04 version of the SCA-J
>> specifications, I have the following comments:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Editorial issues that should be fixed before we publish a CD*
>>
>>
>>
>> Document Footer:
>>
>> Document version is wrong – it has WD03 but this is WD04
>>
>> Date is wrong – title page says 15 August 2008 but footer says 27 May
>> 2008-09-15
>>
>>
>>
>> PDF Document:
>>
>> Page numbers are wrong in the footer. It has Page 1 of 1, Page 2 of 2,
>> etc. The Word document is correct.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Minor Editorial issues that don’t need to be fixed before we publish
>> a CD*
>>
>>
>>
>> Page 7 – line 15
>>
>> Extra space between end of sentence and full stop (.)
>>
>>
>>
>> Page 17 – line 332
>>
>> The code is coloured differently to the rest of the document. The
>> keywords public and boolean should be purple
>>
>> Actually – this is a general problem throughout the specification.
>> Some code is coloured – other code is not.
>>
>
> The general problem is not fixed.
>
>>
>>
>> Page 17 – line 359
>>
>> Text is using the wrong font size (10 point.) The rest of the document
>> uses 9 point font size. This is not visible in the PDF version of the
>> specification but can be seen as the text being “more bold” in the
>> Word version.
>>
>>
>>
>> Page 27 – line 780
>>
>> Remove extra space between ServiceReference<B> and extends
>>
>>
>>
>> Page 27 – line 795
>>
>> Supplied is spelt wrongly – in the document it is spelt suppied
>>
>>
>>
>> Page 39 – line 1349
>>
>> Section is missing example of using @Property with a Constructor. It
>> has examples for the other two cases.
>>
>
> Not done.
>
>>
>>
>> Page 40 – line 1408
>>
>> Section is missing example of using @Reference with a Constructor. It
>> has examples for the other two cases.
>>
>
> Not done.
>
>>
>>
>> Page 60 – lines 2235 to 2260
>>
>> Text is using the wrong font size (10 point.) The rest of the document
>> uses 9 point font size. This is not visible in the PDF version of the
>> specification but can be seen as the text being “more bold” in the
>> Word version.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *QUESTIONS*
>>
>>
>>
>> I thought we agreed that we would update the style of the references
>> from [1] to [RFC2119]? Or was this for the Assembly specification?
>>
>>
>
> Can't remember either, so not fixed.
>
I believe that this was discussed and agreed by this TC. If there is
any doubt, let's address this on the call today.
Simon
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> Mark Combellack| Software Developer| Avaya | Eastern Business Park |
>> St. Mellons | Cardiff | CF3 5EA | Voice: +44 (0) 29 2081 7624 |
>> <mailto:|>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
