>>> I thought we agreed that we would update the style of the references
>>> from [1] to [RFC2119]? Or was this for the Assembly specification?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Can't remember either, so not fixed.
>>
> I believe that this was discussed and agreed by this TC. If there is
> any doubt, let's address this on the call today.
Is the TC ok with the editors making this change in cd01-rev1 ? Can we
have an action for the editors, so that they don't forget (would have
done this now, but have to wait for the CD01 pub to go thru).
-Anish
--
Simon Nash wrote:
> Anish Karmarkar wrote:
>> All of these fixed in WD05 except as noted below.
>>
>> -Anish
>> --
>>
>> Mark Combellack wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Having reviewed the changes in WD04 version of the SCA-J
>>> specifications, I have the following comments:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Editorial issues that should be fixed before we publish a CD*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Document Footer:
>>>
>>> Document version is wrong – it has WD03 but this is WD04
>>>
>>> Date is wrong – title page says 15 August 2008 but footer says 27 May
>>> 2008-09-15
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PDF Document:
>>>
>>> Page numbers are wrong in the footer. It has Page 1 of 1, Page 2 of
>>> 2, etc. The Word document is correct.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Minor Editorial issues that don’t need to be fixed before we publish
>>> a CD*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Page 7 – line 15
>>>
>>> Extra space between end of sentence and full stop (.)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Page 17 – line 332
>>>
>>> The code is coloured differently to the rest of the document. The
>>> keywords public and boolean should be purple
>>>
>>> Actually – this is a general problem throughout the specification.
>>> Some code is coloured – other code is not.
>>>
>>
>> The general problem is not fixed.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Page 17 – line 359
>>>
>>> Text is using the wrong font size (10 point.) The rest of the
>>> document uses 9 point font size. This is not visible in the PDF
>>> version of the specification but can be seen as the text being “more
>>> bold” in the Word version.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Page 27 – line 780
>>>
>>> Remove extra space between ServiceReference<B> and extends
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Page 27 – line 795
>>>
>>> Supplied is spelt wrongly – in the document it is spelt suppied
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Page 39 – line 1349
>>>
>>> Section is missing example of using @Property with a Constructor. It
>>> has examples for the other two cases.
>>>
>>
>> Not done.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Page 40 – line 1408
>>>
>>> Section is missing example of using @Reference with a Constructor. It
>>> has examples for the other two cases.
>>>
>>
>> Not done.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Page 60 – lines 2235 to 2260
>>>
>>> Text is using the wrong font size (10 point.) The rest of the
>>> document uses 9 point font size. This is not visible in the PDF
>>> version of the specification but can be seen as the text being “more
>>> bold” in the Word version.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *QUESTIONS*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I thought we agreed that we would update the style of the references
>>> from [1] to [RFC2119]? Or was this for the Assembly specification?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Can't remember either, so not fixed.
>>
> I believe that this was discussed and agreed by this TC. If there is
> any doubt, let's address this on the call today.
>
> Simon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>> Mark Combellack| Software Developer| Avaya | Eastern Business Park |
>>> St. Mellons | Cardiff | CF3 5EA | Voice: +44 (0) 29 2081 7624 |
>>> <mailto:|>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
