Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 118: EJB Binding: Need description for <wireFormat/> and<operationSelection/> - proposal v3
Ok, then the current proposal looks like this: (See attached file: sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-03+issue118_v3.doc) Dave Booz STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC "Distributed objects first, then world hunger" Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093 e-mail: Anish Karmarkar ---06/19/2009 01:51:42 AM---Ok, makes sense to not take away the extensibility. -Anish From: Anish Karmarkar <> To: Date: 06/19/2009 01:51 AM Subject: Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 118: EJB Binding: Need description for <wireFormat/> and <operationSelection/> - proposal v3 Ok, makes sense to not take away the extensibility. -Anish -- David Booz wrote: > I don't see any reason to be punitive and take away this extensibility > point. And further, IIRC, the JEE specs allow for any wire level > transport protocol (and by extension message format) when interacting > with EJBs. > > Dave Booz > STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture > Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC > "Distributed objects first, then world hunger" > Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093 > e-mail: > > Inactive hide details for Anish Karmarkar ---06/12/2009 02:46:39 > AM---Seems like a good way to resolve this. One question I do Anish > Karmarkar ---06/12/2009 02:46:39 AM---Seems like a good way to resolve > this. One question I do have is: do we still want to allow this (as > > > From: > Anish Karmarkar <> > > To: > David Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS > > Cc: > > > Date: > 06/12/2009 02:46 AM > > Subject: > Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 118: EJB Binding: Need description for <wireFormat/> > and <operationSelection/> - proposal v3 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Seems like a good way to resolve this. > > One question I do have is: do we still want to allow this (as an > extension point) or disallow it in this binding? > > -Anish > -- > > David Booz wrote: > > If we agree to go this route, the EJB binding spec might look different > > than the current proposal. I would throw away the current proposal and > > simply add a new section before the Appendix, like this: > > > > 7 Wire Format and Operation Selectors > > > > The SCA Assembly Model Specification [ASSEMBLY] defines extensibility > > points for bindings to specify <wireFormat/> and <operationSelector/> > > configuration. This specification does not define any wire format or > > operation selector extension elements. > > > > > > Dave Booz > > STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture > > Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC > > "Distributed objects first, then world hunger" > > Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093 > > e-mail: > > > > Inactive hide details for Mike Edwards ---06/11/2009 02:53:09 > > AM---Folks, I wonder why we need a description of these 2 elementMike > > Edwards ---06/11/2009 02:53:09 AM---Folks, I wonder why we need a > > description of these 2 elements in this binding, > > > > > > From: > > Mike Edwards <> > > > > To: > > "OASIS Java" <> > > > > Date: > > 06/11/2009 02:53 AM > > > > Subject: > > Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 118: EJB Binding: Need description for <wireFormat/> > > and <operationSelection/> - proposal v2 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > Folks, > > > > I wonder why we need a description of these 2 elements in this binding, > > given that it does not actually support them. > > > > I note that the issue has been raised in Assembly to make the elements > > abstract, so that in reality only specific extended > > forms of these elements can be used anywhere - and this spec states that > > it does not support any of them. > > > > > > Yours, Mike. > > > > Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO. > > Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC. > > IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain. > > Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431 > > Email: > > > > From: David Booz <> > > To: > > Date: 10/06/2009 15:22 > > Subject: [sca-j] ISSUE 118: EJB Binding: Need description for > > <wireFormat/> and <operationSelection/> - proposal v2 > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > There was a small editorial change to this proposal noted in the > > telecon. I am reposting v2 of the proposal just for that change. I > > believe we are blocked on this issue until Anish raises the binding > > issue to address wireFormat and OperationSelector in the pseudo schema > > of the WS binding spec./ > > > > (See attached file: sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-03+issue118_v2.doc)/ > > > > Dave Booz > > STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture > > Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC > > "Distributed objects first, then world hunger" > > Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093 > > e-mail:[attachment > > "sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-03+issue118_v2.doc" deleted by Mike > > Edwards/UK/IBM] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:_ > > > __https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php_ > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > / > > / > > > > /Unless stated otherwise above: > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > > 741598. > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire > PO6 3AU/ > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-03+issue118_v3.doc
Next in thread →
Next in month →