Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 122: EJB Binding - Remove references to conversationalfunction - proposal v3

I chose (d).  I also adjusted the wording of the isIdentical() method because it didn't read correctly.  I didn't intend to change any semantics.

Here's the latest proposal:

(See attached file: sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-03+issue122_v3.doc)

Dave Booz

STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture

Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC

"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"

Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093  or  8-295-6093

e-mail:

Anish Karmarkar ---06/19/2009 01:44:49 AM---I like (c) or (d) as well. -Anish

From:

Anish Karmarkar <>

To:



Date:

06/19/2009 01:44 AM

Subject:

Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 122: EJB Binding - Remove references to conversational function - proposal v2 and Call for action

I like (c) or (d) as well.

-Anish

--

David Booz wrote:

> Anish,

> Thanks for taking the time to review. I've addressed the editorial 

> comments and will post those updates once we resolve your non-ed comment.

> 

> It is legal to remove a stateless session bean, but the effect is not 

> visible to the client. That is, you can successfully invoke a business 

> method after calling remove.

> 

> What if we changed the behavior column to one of:

> (a) N/A

> (b) not-applicable

> (c) This is a no-op for stateless session beans.

> 

> Or possibly even better:

> (d) Remove the first two rows of the table as there is nothing SCA 

> specific to say about the remove() or getPrimaryKey() methods. Further, 

> there are more methods in the EJBObject and EJBLocalObject interfaces 

> which currently aren't mentioned at all in the table, so the table has 

> never been an exhaustive treatment of those interfaces.

> 

> I have a slight preference for (c) or (d).

> 

> Dave Booz

> STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture

> Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC

> "Distributed objects first, then world hunger"

> Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093

> e-mail:

> 

> Inactive hide details for Anish Karmarkar ---06/12/2009 02:13:18 

> AM---Two very minor ed comments: 1) 3rd para in section 1 (whiAnish 

> Karmarkar ---06/12/2009 02:13:18 AM---Two very minor ed comments: 1) 3rd 

> para in section 1 (which has only one sentence) can be merged

> 

> 

> From:		 

> Anish Karmarkar <>

> 

> To:		 

> David Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS

> 

> Cc:		 

> 

> 

> Date:		 

> 06/12/2009 02:13 AM

> 

> Subject:		 

> Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 122: EJB Binding - Remove references to conversational 

> function - proposal v2 and Call for action

> 

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> 

> 

> 

> Two very minor ed comments:

> 

> 1) 3rd para in section 1 (which has only one sentence) can be merged

> with the 5th para (right after the bullets). They belong together.

> 2) s/Stateful session beans are out of scope in this

> specification/Stateful session beans are out of scope for this

> specification/

> 

> One non-ed comment:

> 

> 1) The table in section 6.1 now says that 'Remove' is a no-op. We don't

> have very many RFC 2119 keywords right now. But if this table is a MUST,

> then support for stateful session beans can't be an extension point.

> 

> -Anish

> --

> 

> David Booz wrote:

>  > I made some textual updates to section 1 following the comments from the

>  > last telecon, rewording the removal of stateful session beans to 'out of

>  > scope'. No other updates have been made as no other textual changes have

>  > been proposed.

>  >

>  > The sense of the TC was that some time was needed to contemplate the

>  > removal of stateful session bean support from the spec. This is your

>  > reminder to put your thoughts into email.

>  >

>  > /(See attached file: sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-03+issue122_v2.doc)/

>  >

>  > Dave Booz

>  > STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture

>  > Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC

>  > "Distributed objects first, then world hunger"

>  > Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093

>  > e-mail:

>  >

>  >

>  > ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>  >

>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------

>  > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

>  > generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

>  > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 

> 

> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 

sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-03+issue122_v3.doc