Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 118: EJB Binding: Need description for <wireFormat/> and<operationSelection/> - proposal v2

Folks,

I wonder why we need a description of
these 2 elements in this binding, given that it does not actually support
them.

I note that the issue has been raised
in Assembly to make the elements abstract, so that in reality only specific
extended

forms of these elements can be used
anywhere - and this spec states that it does not support any of them.

Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.

Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.

IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.

Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  

Email:  

From:
David Booz <>

To:


Date:
10/06/2009 15:22

Subject:
[sca-j] ISSUE 118: EJB Binding: Need
description for <wireFormat/> and <operationSelection/> - proposal
v2

There was a small editorial change to this proposal noted
in the telecon. I am reposting v2 of the proposal just for that change.
I believe we are blocked on this issue until Anish raises the binding issue
to address wireFormat and OperationSelector in the pseudo schema of the
WS binding spec.

(See attached file: sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-03+issue118_v2.doc)

Dave Booz

STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture

Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC

"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"

Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093

e-mail:[attachment "sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-03+issue118_v2.doc"
deleted by Mike Edwards/UK/IBM] ---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU