RE: [sca-j] [SCA-J] Current open issue status

From
Mark Combellack <>
Date
2009-07-17T09:18:45+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [sca-j] [SCA-J] Current open issue status
Hi Mike,

 

Thanks for letting me know about the
proposals you plan to build. Much appreciated.

 

I’ve added your latest proposal for issue
59 to the agenda for the call today (Friday).

 

Thanks,

 

Mark

Mark Combellack| Software Developer| Avaya | Eastern Business Park | St. Mellons | Cardiff |
CF3 5EA | Voice: +44 (0) 29 2081 7624 | 

From:
Mike Edwards [mailto:] 

Sent: 17 July 2009 09:37

To: OASIS Java

Subject: Re: [sca-j] [SCA-J]
Current open issue status

 

Mark, 

I
will build proposals for Issues 149, 167, 106, 163 once we have a resolution
for Issue 58 (with luck, today). 

My
intention is to create a WD02 of the Spring spec based on the resolutions of
Issues 58 and 164, which 

then
lays the groundwork for the text of the resolutions of the other issues.

Issue
59 now has an updated proposal that I just sent to the list. 

Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.

Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.

IBM Hursley
Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21
  2JN, Great Britain.

Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  

Email:   

 

  
  
From:
  

  
  
  
"Mark Combellack"
  <> 

  
 

 

  
  
To:
  

  
  
  
"OASIS Java" <>
  

  
 

 

  
  
Date:
  

  
  
  
16/07/2009 19:24 

  
 

 

  
  
Subject:
  

  
  
  
[sca-j] [SCA-J] Current open issue status

  
 

 

Hi, 

 

I have
been going through the list of Open issues for SCA-J [1] and classifying their
current status. I’ve shown the breakdown below. 

 

One
thing that I have observed is that we have very few issues (one or two) that
are in a position where we can make progress on them on the calls. We currently
have 8 issues that are waiting for updated proposals which we will be able to
discuss when the updates are completed. 

 

To
ensure that we continue making progress (and don’t run out of items for
the agendas), could I encourage everyone to look at the list below and see if
they update/produce proposals for these open issues. 

 

I
realise that everyone is likely to be busy so any extra effort you can provide
will be appreciated. 

 

Thanks,

 

Mark

 

From [1] http://www.osoa.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=10023&status=1&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=ASC

 

 

Ready for progress on the call 

 

JAVA-58
          SCA Spring C&I Specification does not
have a normative definition of how to calculate the ComponentType of a Spring
Application context 

 

 

Possibly ready for progress on the call 

 

JAVA-127
         Long running request/response operations

 

 

Waiting for updated proposal (with action item for the
update) 

JAVA-149
         SCA Spring C & I specification need to
specify the limitations of implicit references (AI: Mike E) 

JAVA-150
         SCA Spring C & I specification need to
mention how SCA runtime should load multiple application context files. (AI:
Ram) 

JAVA-166
         Spring C&I does not say anything about
SCA annotations (AI: Anish) 

JAVA-167
         SCA Spring C & I specification should
make type attribute as optional for <sca:service/> element (AI: Mike E)

 

 

Waiting for updated proposal 

 

JAVA-46
          equals() method on ServiceReference and
CallableReference (Last updated by: Mark C) 

JAVA-59
          SCA Spring C & I specification does not
state what happens when a Bean exposed as a service implements mutliple
interfaces (Last updated by: Mike E) 

JAVA-155
         Inconsistent normative statements in Chapter
10 (Last updated by: Simon N) 

JAVA-168
         Conversion rules for property values are not
specified (Last updated by: Simon N) 

 

 

No proposal 

 

JAVA-13
          ComponentContext.getProperty(...) ill
defined 

JAVA-51
          More examples on <interface.wsdl>
mapping to Java 

JAVA-54
          Section 7.1 of the Java CAA Specification is
unclear 

JAVA-62
          Clarify what a Component Implementation can
do with threads 

JAVA-63
          SCA Spring C & I specification does not
state whether Constructor Injection should be supported 

JAVA-78
          Need API to set EPR and for a reference
invocation 

JAVA-106
         RFC2119 Language is needed for Spring C&I
Specification 

JAVA-107
         RFC2119 Language is needed for the EJB
Binding Specification 

JAVA-156
         Intent annotations are missing from Java CAA
as compared to Policy FW spec 

JAVA-163
         Spring C&I sca-spring:reference element
has a default attribute which is unexplained 

 

 

Blocked by other proposals 

 

JAVA-92
          Spring C&I spec needs to define how
effective CT is calculated (Blocked by JAVA-58) 

JAVA-114
         Spring CI runtime behaviour when annotation
rules are violated (Blocked by 166) 

 

Mark Combellack| Software Developer| Avaya | Eastern Business Park | St. Mellons | Cardiff | CF3 5EA | Voice: +44 (0) 29 2081 7624 | 

 

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England
and Wales
with number 741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41,
  North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU