Scott Cantor wrote:
> I'm not 100% sure, but it may be that I (or someone) was supposed to
> note that schema change and restrict it to one message element. I didn't
> recall that it was still multiply occurring, actually, which is why I
> was thinking it might be an oversight.
>
> I had no particular semantics in mind for having more than one other
> than multiple languages, certainly.
In that case, why don't we make it 0..1. It would enable my more
preferred solution for multiple languages, Option 1, later.
--
Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ sun.com
