Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [soa-rm-editors] Re: Dispositions

From
<>
Date
2005-06-13T15:20:56+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [soa-rm-editors] Re: Dispositions
Dear Chief Editor (Matt),

I have submitted a new section on Discovery, Presence and Availability to be incorporated into the new draft.

Dear Don,

Please update the proposed dispositions for all comments related to section 2.4.* to point to the new submitted piece.

Dear Colleagues,

I am in some inner turmoil with respect to what concepts perform what actions. The face-to-face will undoubtedly clear these issues up.

Thanks,

Wes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Francis McCabe [mailto:] 
Sent:	June 9, 2005 1:05 PM
To:	Francis McCabe
Cc:	McGregor, Wesley; ; 
Subject:	Re: [soa-rm-editors] Re: Dispositions

To be more specific.
A suitable approach (to deal with the issues on the policy/contract  
and semantics sections) seems to be:

1. redraft the sections, taking comments into account.
2. where possible and appropriate, attaching notes to specific  
sentences referring to the issue numbers.

Frank

On Jun 9, 2005, at 9:58 AM, Francis McCabe wrote:

> Yes.
>
> On Jun 9, 2005, at 9:53 AM, <> wrote:
>
>
>> Yes Sir.
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>> From:     Don Flinn [mailto:]
>> Sent:    June 9, 2005 12:46 PM
>> To:    McGregor, Wesley
>> Cc:    ; 
>> Subject:    RE: [soa-rm-editors] Re: Dispositions
>>
>> Wes and Frank
>>
>> I would be happy to defer to your judgment, however, we have to  
>> remember
>> that there is the conflicting goal of moving ahead.  I presume  
>> that you
>> both think that on balance the best approach is to do the re- 
>> write.  Is
>> that a correct assumption?
>>
>> Duane and Matt please jump in on this conversation with your words of
>> wisdom.
>>
>> Don
>>
>> On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 11:57 -0400,   
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I agree with Frank as I will be doing the same.
>>>
>>> Wes
>>>  -----Original Message-----
>>> From:     Francis McCabe [mailto:]
>>> Sent:    June 9, 2005 11:56 AM
>>> To:    Don Flinn
>>> Cc:    soa-rm-editors
>>> Subject:    [soa-rm-editors] Re: Dispositions
>>>
>>> Actually, I have a different suggestion.
>>>
>>> I would propose a complete redraft of my section(s), incorporating
>>> the suggestions, and a few additional ones.
>>>
>>> It is easier for me, and I think easier for the group, to see a
>>> coherent picture. Of course, I would then also need to show how the
>>> issues have been approached.
>>>
>>> I have been putting this off a little, but I think that this is the
>>> best course of action to respond to the comments.
>>>
>>> Frank
>>>
>>> On Jun 8, 2005, at 9:14 PM, Don Flinn wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>> Could you put your response to Issue 7-28 into another document and
>>>> upload a documents containing the PD to
>>>> Issues Lists / Dispositions / Draft 07 on the our TC members page?
>>>>
>>>> I will then hyperlink it in the issues list.  Yes, more
>>>> bureaucracy, but
>>>> I need some control.  Appreciate your help.
>>>>
>>>> Don
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 10:49 -0700, Francis McCabe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Bullets -- agreed
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Don Flinn
>>>> President, Flint Security LLC
>>>> Tel: 781-856-7230
>>>> Fax: 781-631-7693
>>>> e-mail: 
>>>> http://flintsecurity.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> -- 
>> Don Flinn
>> President, Flint Security LLC
>> Tel: 781-856-7230
>> Fax: 781-631-7693
>> e-mail: 
>> http://flintsecurity.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Next in thread → Next in month →