That would be the term of choice for me too.
(Sorry. Didn't get a chance respond early)
Thanks,
/Prasanta
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter F Brown [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 6:56 PM
To: 'SOA-RM'
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map
Surely semantics "constrain" rather than "govern" or "define"?
Specifically,
they constrain meaning within a specified domain ontology
-Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Behera, Prasanta [mailto:]
Sent: 31 May 2005 20:03
To: Matthew MacKenzie; Francis McCabe
Cc: SOA-RM
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map
#1: Can u expand a little bit on the semantics of "govern"? Semantics
"define" and "govern" policy.
#2: The relationship between "Data Model" and "Services" -- should it be
more of a association type (line instead of a arrow)
Thanks,
/Prasanta
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew MacKenzie [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:13 AM
To: Francis McCabe
Cc: SOA-RM
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map
Having some problems with arrows in this tool, but I added another
relationship to contract (attached).
