Ok, I'm happy with constrain as well.
-matt
Behera, Prasanta wrote:
>That would be the term of choice for me too.
>(Sorry. Didn't get a chance respond early)
>
>Thanks,
>/Prasanta
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Peter F Brown [mailto:]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 6:56 PM
>To: 'SOA-RM'
>Subject: RE: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map
>
>Surely semantics "constrain" rather than "govern" or "define"?
>Specifically,
>they constrain meaning within a specified domain ontology
>
>-Peter
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Behera, Prasanta [mailto:]
>Sent: 31 May 2005 20:03
>To: Matthew MacKenzie; Francis McCabe
>Cc: SOA-RM
>Subject: RE: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map
>
>#1: Can u expand a little bit on the semantics of "govern"? Semantics
>"define" and "govern" policy.
>
>#2: The relationship between "Data Model" and "Services" -- should it be
>more of a association type (line instead of a arrow)
>
>Thanks,
>/Prasanta
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Matthew MacKenzie [mailto:]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:13 AM
>To: Francis McCabe
>Cc: SOA-RM
>Subject: Re: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map
>
>Having some problems with arrows in this tool, but I added another
>relationship to contract (attached).
>
>
>
>
>
