[Replying on SOA-RM TC list only]
Let me be the first to say that I think a "service-oriented architecture
joint committee" is an *excellent* idea.
Joe
Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz Allen Hamilton
700 13th St. NW
Washington, DC 20005
O: 202-508-6514
C: 202-251-0731
Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 1:46 PM
> To: ; ;
> ;
> ;
> Subject: [soa-rm] JtC = cross post solution (was) ... Re: The
> real SOA challenge?
>
> 1. Reply to Joe and John: I hope so.
> 2. Request to all: This interesting but long thread is
> going on in five e-mail lists. These TCs have much in
> common, that properly is a basis for further chat, but while
> maintaining the separate and independent activities of each
> TC. I would like to suggest a solution. It would take some
> duplicate traffic off these lists, and provide a place for
> these cross-TC, SOA-oriented coordination conversations.
> I suggest that these 5 TCs consider starting a "service
> architecture joint committee." The rules of that OASIS
> structure can be found at
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#2.16. It
> does not require any surrender of each committee's own work
> plan or views, but would provide a forum for discussion of
> possible voluntary coordination. I will take this up further
> with your committee chairs, and discuss what kind of
> charter/outline might work. If the TCs (or some subset of
> them) wish to do so, a JtC would create a place where matters
> of joint interest can be more effectively discussed.
> Regards Jamie
>
> ~ James Bryce Clark
> ~ Director, Standards Development, OASIS
> ~
>
> At 08:39 AM 11/17/2005, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> >>From: John Hardin [mailto:]
> >>Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 10:29 AM
> >>* * *
> >>We are working these three items into the next generation
> of the OASIS
> >>Technical Architecture.
> >
> >I believe you meant to say "ebXML Technical Architecture"?
> >Joe
>
>
