I also like the idea of having a committee that explains SOA related
work and all of the various OASIS WS-* protocol working groups to the
public
This might be a starting point for the proposed TC.
"Introduction to the OASIS SOA Work: The Reference Model and SOA
Blueprints Technical Committees"
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/document.php?document_id=15449
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/download.php/15449/I
ntroduction%20to%20SOA%20OASIS%20work%20-%20QandA%20%20v.04.doc
John,
Please chip in your proposed FAQ as well.
Regards,
Oleg Mikulinsky.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 1:52 PM
To: James Bryce Clark;
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] JtC = cross post solution (was) ... Re: The real
SOA challenge?
[Replying on SOA-RM TC list only]
Let me be the first to say that I think a "service-oriented architecture
joint committee" is an *excellent* idea.
Joe
Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz Allen Hamilton
700 13th St. NW
Washington, DC 20005
O: 202-508-6514
C: 202-251-0731
Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 1:46 PM
> To: ; ;
> ;
> ;
> Subject: [soa-rm] JtC = cross post solution (was) ... Re: The real SOA
> challenge?
>
> 1. Reply to Joe and John: I hope so.
> 2. Request to all: This interesting but long thread is going on
> in five e-mail lists. These TCs have much in common, that properly is
> a basis for further chat, but while maintaining the separate and
> independent activities of each TC. I would like to suggest a
> solution. It would take some duplicate traffic off these lists, and
> provide a place for these cross-TC, SOA-oriented coordination
> conversations.
> I suggest that these 5 TCs consider starting a "service
> architecture joint committee." The rules of that OASIS structure can
> be found at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#2.16. It
> does not require any surrender of each committee's own work plan or
> views, but would provide a forum for discussion of possible voluntary
> coordination. I will take this up further with your committee chairs,
> and discuss what kind of charter/outline might work. If the TCs (or
> some subset of
> them) wish to do so, a JtC would create a place where matters of joint
> interest can be more effectively discussed.
> Regards Jamie
>
> ~ James Bryce Clark
> ~ Director, Standards Development, OASIS
> ~
>
> At 08:39 AM 11/17/2005, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> >>From: John Hardin [mailto:]
> >>Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 10:29 AM
> >>* * *
> >>We are working these three items into the next generation
> of the OASIS
> >>Technical Architecture.
> >
> >I believe you meant to say "ebXML Technical Architecture"?
> >Joe
>
>
