Groups - OASIS TOSCA Interop Demo - Abstract - 2013-08-26 RP3.docx uploaded

From
Matthew Rutkowski <>
Date
2013-08-26T19:27:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Groups - OASIS TOSCA Interop Demo - Abstract - 2013-08-26 RP3.docx uploaded
If we resolve on a new abstract (just the
 demo. participants need to all agree) we can vote on the update next week
 at the SC and ask Jane to update at that point.  Do not want promotion
 to be held up and we did approve the initial version today.

It is just an abstract to draw awareness
 and attention.  Do no forget that Richard is still working on the
 larger (~ 500 word) full description to provide Jane shortly which can
 be infused with more details on value proposition, etc.

Kind regards,

Matt
From:
    "Probst, Richard"
 <>
To:
    "Lipton, Paul
 C" <>, ""
 <>
Date:
    08/26/2013 01:50 PM
Subject:
      RE: [tosca-interop]
 Groups - OASIS TOSCA Interop Demo - Abstract - 2013-08-26 RP3.docx uploaded

Sent by:
      <>

Hi Paul,



Yes, I edited your second
 upload. You will see the red-lines.



I changed all instances of
 “This demo” to “The demo” because I believe it reads better, and the
 context is clear as soon as someone has read the first sentence. But if
 you really insist, change it back.



Since the SC approved the
 draft today and Matt immediately sent it to Jane to get it posted ASAP,
 I think changes should be copied to the SC, so I don’t want to take this
 offline. We should be able to converge it quickly, before people get sick
 of the spam.



Best,

  --Richard
From:  
 [
mailto:
]
  On Behalf Of  Lipton, Paul C
 Sent:  Monday, August 26, 2013 11:39 AM
To:  Probst, Richard; 
Subject:  RE: [tosca-interop] Groups - OASIS TOSCA Interop Demo - Abstract
 - 2013-08-26 RP3.docx uploaded



Hi Richard,



Thanks for the iteration. FYI, there were
 actually a number of minor and some medium level tweaks, as well, to sentences,
 e.g. for a minor one, don’t call the demo “the OASIS demo,” but rather
 “This OASIS demo,” unless you never think we’ll have another OASIS demo.
 :-)



More seriously, please bear with me, as
 I will have to take a look later today. Could you please confirm (offline
 if you want) that you based this on my second upload (revision #2) at
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tosca-interop/download.php/50444/OASIS%20TOSCA%20Interop%20Demo%20-%20Abstract%20-%202013-08-26%20PL2.docx
?



If anybody wants Richard and me to take
 this often line, just let us know, of course.



Thanks,

Paul
From:

 [
mailto:
]
  On Behalf Of  Richard Probst
 Sent:  Monday, August 26, 2013 2:26 PM
To:

Subject:  [tosca-interop] Groups - OASIS TOSCA Interop Demo - Abstract
 - 2013-08-26 RP3.docx uploaded



Submitter's message
 Paul, if we want to put the value proposition first, we can do that. However,
 I think that this will require a little more editing than simply changing
 the order of sentences, so I am not comfortable with this revision. In
 the spirit of rapid iteration, here is a revision to your revision.

 Best,
 --Richard

--
Mr. Richard Probst

Document Name :
OASIS
 TOSCA Interop Demo - Abstract - 2013-08-26 RP3.docx

No description provided.

Download
 Latest Revision

Public
 Download Link

Submitter : Mr. Richard Probst
 Group : TOSCA Interoperability SC
 Folder : Documents
 Date submitted : 2013-08-26 11:26:00
 Revision : 3