This is a very good point. By performing the steps you suggest, we can also
get a better grip on point 1) from my mail (i.e. to what extent is the ebXML
work an appropriate basis for the UBL context methodology).
Another point: do people generally understand the ebXML document? I'd be
interested to know whether we need to ask someone to provide a high-level
explanation of the goals of the effort and how they were addressed,
outstanding issues, etc.
Matt
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Burcham, Bill [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 8:44 PM
> To: 'Matthew Gertner'; ''
> Subject: RE: [ubl-cmsc] Context Methodology Issues
>
>
> I'd like to propose an item: Develop a Few Scenarios for CDA.
> In order to
> leverage the participants of this SC I believe we need to a)
> understand a
> common set of scenarios, b) have consensus on their relative
> importance so
> that we can c) distill requirements and d) evaluate design
> alternatives. I
> don't think we can skip a-c.
>
> -Bill
>
