Todd,
I must concur with Mike on this. In fact, I think it is confusing and
counter-productive for you to redistribute UBL comments to the eBTWG
lists for discussion. This is why we have a formal comments submission
process. Groups like UBL need to get their thoughts together and
present them formally to groups like eBTWG.
UBL welcomes your comments and contribution to our discussion - but
please dont waste the bandwidth of eBTWG list members. It only serves
to add to the static interference.
Michael C. Rawlins wrote:
>May I note that there is a difference between a proposed draft and
>your characterization that the "UBL TC has recommended"? This topic
>is still under discussion.
>
>At Monday, 29 April 2002, Todd Boyle <> wrote:
>
>>UBL TC has recommended that the Core Component Type and
>>Representation Term (CCT and RT) "Identifier" be eliminated from
>>the CCTS.
>>
<remainder of message removed>>
>
>.
>
--
regards
tim mcgrath
fremantle western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142
