Tim,
I would rather have more communication than less. Certainly by sharing
this discussion topic it gave others' (potentially me) time to think about
it and potentially pursue external discussions with participating UBL
members. I also always have a choice to delete the message if I am not
interested. But to expedite the development of these technical
specifications, I prefer to hear am many points of view as possible - a
believe that one of the opportunities present by list servers, is to
quickly share communications with a large group of interested readers. I
must say that I think this topic will be huge if/when presented as a
comment to CCTS - so preparation and understand of the originators point of
view is critical.
My 2 cents!
regards
melanie mccarthy
Tim McGrath <> on 04/30/2002 07:07:19 AM
Please respond to
To: Todd Boyle <>
cc: , ,
Subject: Re: [ubl-comment] UBL comments on ebXML Core Components
Technical Specification v1.8
Todd,
I must concur with Mike on this. In fact, I think it is confusing and
counter-productive for you to redistribute UBL comments to the eBTWG
lists for discussion. This is why we have a formal comments submissi
on
process. Groups like UBL need to get their thoughts together and
present them formally to groups like eBTWG.
UBL welcomes your comments and contribution to our discussion - but
please dont waste the bandwidth of eBTWG list members. It only serves
to add to the static interference.
<remainder of message removed>>
