ebXML, UBL and other groups need a more modern
collaboration platform than email. This platform gets
in our way like this, *all the time*. This is unfortunate and
avoidable. The need to manually decide to crosspost to
adjacent communities, or stop crossposting, is archaic
and artificial,
respectfully,
Todd
At 07:05 AM 4/30/02, Michael C. Rawlins wrote:
>This message is prime example of a reason *not* to cross post topics like
>this. I am not subscribed to the ebtwg-ccs, so I did not see Ms.
>McCarthy's response and I won't see any others on that list. I'm sure
>there are others like me, and the reverse is true for folks on that list
>who are not on the UBL-comment list. I suggest that we kill this thread
>and open a new one on *one* list if anyone wants to continue this topic.
>
>At 09:57 PM 4/30/02 +0800, Tim McGrath wrote:
>>Conversely, why have a formal comment process if we can debate all issues
>>over the list(s) ;-)
>>
>><mailto:> wrote:
>>>
>>>Tim,
>>>
>>>I would rather have more communication than less. Certainly by sharing
>>>this discussion topic it gave others' (potentially me) time to think about
>>>it and potentially pursue external discussions with participating UBL
>>>members. I also always have a choice to delete the message if I am not
>>>interested. But to expedite the development of these technical
>>>specifications, I prefer to hear am many points of view as possible - a
>>>believe that one of the opportunities present by list servers, is to
>>>quickly share communications with a large group of interested readers. I
>>>must say that I think this topic will be huge if/when presented as a
>>>comment to CCTS - so preparation and understand of the originators point of
>>>view is critical.
>>>
>>>My 2 cents!
>>>regards
>>>
>>>melanie mccarthy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Tim McGrath <mailto:><>
>>>on 04/30/2002 07:07:19 AM
>>>
>>>Please respond to <mailto:>
>>>
>>>To: Todd Boyle <mailto:><>
>>>cc:
>>><mailto:>,
>>><mailto:>,
>>> <mailto:>
>>>Subject: Re: [ubl-comment] UBL comments on ebXML Core Components
>>> Technical Specification v1.8
>>>
>>>
>>>Todd,
>>>
>>>I must concur with Mike on this. In fact, I think it is confusing and
>>>counter-productive for you to redistribute UBL comments to the eBTWG
>>>lists for discussion. This is why we have a formal comments submissi
>>>on
>>>process. Groups like UBL need to get their thoughts together and
>>>present them formally to groups like eBTWG.
>>>
>>>UBL welcomes your comments and contribution to our discussion - but
>>>please dont waste the bandwidth of eBTWG list members. It only serves
>>>to add to the static interference.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>><remainder of message removed>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>.
>>
>>
>>--
>>regards
>>tim mcgrath
>>fremantle western australia 6160
>>phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>Michael C. Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting
>www.rawlinsecconsulting.com
