This message is prime example of a reason *not* to cross post topics like
this. I am not subscribed to the ebtwg-ccs, so I did not see Ms.
McCarthy's response and I won't see any others on that list. I'm sure
there are others like me, and the reverse is true for folks on that list
who are not on the UBL-comment list. I suggest that we kill this thread
and open a new one on *one* list if anyone wants to continue this topic.
At 09:57 PM 4/30/02 +0800, Tim McGrath wrote:
>Conversely, why have a formal comment process if we can debate all issues
>over the list(s) ;-)
>
><mailto:> wrote:
>>
>>Tim,
>>
>>I would rather have more communication than less. Certainly by sharing
>>this discussion topic it gave others' (potentially me) time to think about
>>it and potentially pursue external discussions with participating UBL
>>members. I also always have a choice to delete the message if I am not
>>interested. But to expedite the development of these technical
>>specifications, I prefer to hear am many points of view as possible - a
>>believe that one of the opportunities present by list servers, is to
>>quickly share communications with a large group of interested readers. I
>>must say that I think this topic will be huge if/when presented as a
>>comment to CCTS - so preparation and understand of the originators point of
>>view is critical.
>>
>>My 2 cents!
>>regards
>>
>>melanie mccarthy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Tim McGrath <mailto:><>
>>on 04/30/2002 07:07:19 AM
>>
>>Please respond to <mailto:>
>>
>>To: Todd Boyle <mailto:><>
>>cc: <mailto:>,
>><mailto:>,
>> <mailto:>
>>Subject: Re: [ubl-comment] UBL comments on ebXML Core Components
>> Technical Specification v1.8
>>
>>
>>Todd,
>>
>>I must concur with Mike on this. In fact, I think it is confusing and
>>counter-productive for you to redistribute UBL comments to the eBTWG
>>lists for discussion. This is why we have a formal comments submissi
>>on
>>process. Groups like UBL need to get their thoughts together and
>>present them formally to groups like eBTWG.
>>
>>UBL welcomes your comments and contribution to our discussion - but
>>please dont waste the bandwidth of eBTWG list members. It only serves
>>to add to the static interference.
>>
>>
>>
>><remainder of message removed>>
>>
>>>
>>>.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>.
>>
>
>
>--
>regards
>tim mcgrath
>fremantle western australia 6160
>phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142
---------------------------------------------------------------
Michael C. Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting
www.rawlinsecconsulting.com
