Thanks,
My impression as that DAML-S is attempting to do more or less the same
as UDDI but within the context of the Semantic Web and RDF - as such it
has the same potential relationship with taxonomies as UDDI, i.e. it
doesn't define a structure for taxonomies per se but would work with
appropriate parts of the semantic web e.g. OWL rather than define its
own.
Is this a misinterpretation?
Matthew
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ugo Corda [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 8:28 PM
> To: Max Voskob;
> Subject: RE: [uddi-spec] Updated Agenda for 2/11-12 FTF - taxonomies
>
> > Can anyone suggest
> > any other standard or initiative that is worth looking at?
>
> I would also take a look at DAML-S (see
http://www.daml.org/services/). I
> believe that organization has already developed prototypes of their
> ontologies built on top of UDDI. They also describe the relationship
> between DAML-S and UDDI in http://www.daml.org/services/daml-
> s/0.7/survey.pdf.
>
> Ugo
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
