W/regards to the addition of the "wsrm:" qualifier when an element name
is mentioned in the text; I noticed that you applied it to things like
"Sequence" and "SequenceAcknowledgement" but not to things like
"Identifier", "MessageNumber" or "LastMessage". Any reason for this?
Also, I couldn't tell from the document which changes you considered to
be in which categories (though I could guess most of the time). I wonder
if we should use the OpenOffice "Note" feature to call these things out?
- g
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:]
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 7:03 PM
> To:
> Subject: [ws-rx-editors] New version of WSRM doc with minor ed fixes
>
> Editors,
>
> I went through the WSRM document and came across a bunch of
> stuff that I divided into three categories (see below). This
> was done to identify and raise issues now rather than towards
> the end (when we are ready to ship and don't have time to fix
> it) -- for those who were on WS-I Basic Profile WG, you will
> know what I'm talking about ;-)
>
> 1) Ed stuff with trivial fixes -- these are trivial errors
> that I found and fixed. The attached doc includes these fixes
> (with change tracking turned on).
> 2) Ed stuff with non-trivial fixes -- these are ed issues,
> which may need some discussion amongst the editors. I'll send
> them in a subsequent email.
> 3) Issues that need to be raised on the TC ML. I'll send
> those to the TC list.
>
> Please let me know if anyone disagrees with the changes that
> I've made.
>
> Rather than listing the changes here, it is quite easy to get
> a list from the attached document. The nature of the changes
> include things like removal of the old copyright notice, font
> changes to make things consistent, fixes for minor ed.
> oversight/errors, inclusion of forward references, adding the
> 'wsrm:' prefix to the XML elements, changing 'fabricam123.com
> to 'example.com' etc.
>
> I'm not sure what sort of editorial leeway the TC has granted
> us, I'm going to assume none, till explicitly authorized by
> the TC. If/once we agree on the changes we can upload the doc
> to the TC site and get approval from the TC.
>
> Comments?
>
> -Anish
> --
>
>
