Gilbert Pilz wrote:
> W/regards to the addition of the "wsrm:" qualifier when an element name
> is mentioned in the text; I noticed that you applied it to things like
> "Sequence" and "SequenceAcknowledgement" but not to things like
> "Identifier", "MessageNumber" or "LastMessage". Any reason for this?
>
Good catch.
I did a search-and-replace for the top-level elements. I'll make those
changes and send another version around. Will do so sometime today in
the afternoon -- have some calls to attend :-(
Marc: sorry about the .sxw document. I'll send a PDF version in my next
email.
> Also, I couldn't tell from the document which changes you considered to
> be in which categories (though I could guess most of the time). I wonder
> if we should use the OpenOffice "Note" feature to call these things out?
>
The document contains only changes from the 1st category.
I did not want to mix the two. As I said in my previous email, I'll send
the changes in the 2nd category in a separate email. "Note" sounds like
a good idea, I'll make sure that it converts correctly to PDF.
> - g
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:]
>>Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 7:03 PM
>>To:
>>Subject: [ws-rx-editors] New version of WSRM doc with minor ed fixes
>>
>>Editors,
>>
>>I went through the WSRM document and came across a bunch of
>>stuff that I divided into three categories (see below). This
>>was done to identify and raise issues now rather than towards
>>the end (when we are ready to ship and don't have time to fix
>>it) -- for those who were on WS-I Basic Profile WG, you will
>>know what I'm talking about ;-)
>>
>>1) Ed stuff with trivial fixes -- these are trivial errors
>>that I found and fixed. The attached doc includes these fixes
>>(with change tracking turned on).
>>2) Ed stuff with non-trivial fixes -- these are ed issues,
>>which may need some discussion amongst the editors. I'll send
>>them in a subsequent email.
>>3) Issues that need to be raised on the TC ML. I'll send
>>those to the TC list.
>>
>>Please let me know if anyone disagrees with the changes that
>>I've made.
>>
>>Rather than listing the changes here, it is quite easy to get
>>a list from the attached document. The nature of the changes
>>include things like removal of the old copyright notice, font
>>changes to make things consistent, fixes for minor ed.
>>oversight/errors, inclusion of forward references, adding the
>>'wsrm:' prefix to the XML elements, changing 'fabricam123.com
>>to 'example.com' etc.
>>
>>I'm not sure what sort of editorial leeway the TC has granted
>>us, I'm going to assume none, till explicitly authorized by
>>the TC. If/once we agree on the changes we can upload the doc
>>to the TC site and get approval from the TC.
>>
>>Comments?
>>
>>-Anish
>>--
>>
>>
