Just added the doc to the editor's doc
list - so while its not cvs at least a note should not be sent out to the
entire tc each time we make a minor edit. I can live with this.
-Doug
Anish Karmarkar <>
09/19/2005 08:33 PM
To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc
Subject
Re: [ws-rx-editors] Minor
nit
This exactly why we really really really need CVS,
now.
The reason I did not change it (although it was trivial to do so) was
because I did not want to update the website for such a small change and
I did not want to prevent other editors from making a (different) change
to the document (write-after-write).
I guess, till we have a CVS we'll have to live with such an arrangement.
Sigh!
-Anish
--
Doug Davis wrote:
>
> Already have a fix for this - just removed the extension from the
> filename. I didn't update the file on the website 'cause I've
been
> updating it too much today and was waiting for a more significant
change
> :-)
> -Doug
>
>
>
> *Anish Karmarkar <>*
>
> 09/19/2005 07:44 PM
>
>
> To
> "Patil,
Sanjay" <>
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re:
[ws-rx-editors] Minor nit
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Can we add this as an Action Item in the WS-RX Editors SC?
> I don't have the permission (I assume, since I don't see the 'add
> Action' button) to do so. Can you add this or give me the right permissions?
>
> This AI list can serve as our TODO list. Once we have enuf of these
> things, we can generate a new draft periodically OR roll it in with
> other substantial changes/issue resolution.
>
> I can fix this, but don't want to generate too may draft that would
make
> it hard for everyone to track. Which reminds me: we really need the
CVS.
> IIRC, we were only going to wait for a few weeks for OASIS to get
its
> act together (and it hasn't). Else we were planning on using
> sourceforge. Not having CVS is very frustrating. What's the status
on
> resolving the IPR/legal issues (if any) wrt using sourceforge?
>
> -Anish
> --
>
>
> Patil, Sanjay wrote:
> > The footer note in the pdf document reads - wsrm-1.1-wd-03.sxw
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sanjay
>
