Thx Doug for updating the ed's doc list.
I guess we can use that as our "CVS" for now.
+1 to not notifying the TC for every minor edit.
-Anish
--
Doug Davis wrote:
>
> Just added the doc to the editor's doc list - so while its not cvs at
> least a note should not be sent out to the entire tc each time we make a
> minor edit. I can live with this.
> -Doug
>
>
>
> *Anish Karmarkar <>*
>
> 09/19/2005 08:33 PM
>
>
> To
> Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: [ws-rx-editors] Minor nit
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This exactly why we really really really need CVS, now.
> The reason I did not change it (although it was trivial to do so) was
> because I did not want to update the website for such a small change and
> I did not want to prevent other editors from making a (different) change
> to the document (write-after-write).
>
> I guess, till we have a CVS we'll have to live with such an arrangement.
> Sigh!
>
> -Anish
> --
>
> Doug Davis wrote:
> >
> > Already have a fix for this - just removed the extension from the
> > filename. I didn't update the file on the website 'cause I've been
> > updating it too much today and was waiting for a more significant change
> > :-)
> > -Doug
> >
> >
> >
> > *Anish Karmarkar <>*
> >
> > 09/19/2005 07:44 PM
> >
> >
> > To
> > "Patil, Sanjay" <>
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > Re: [ws-rx-editors] Minor nit
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Can we add this as an Action Item in the WS-RX Editors SC?
> > I don't have the permission (I assume, since I don't see the 'add
> > Action' button) to do so. Can you add this or give me the right
> permissions?
> >
> > This AI list can serve as our TODO list. Once we have enuf of these
> > things, we can generate a new draft periodically OR roll it in with
> > other substantial changes/issue resolution.
> >
> > I can fix this, but don't want to generate too may draft that would make
> > it hard for everyone to track. Which reminds me: we really need the CVS.
> > IIRC, we were only going to wait for a few weeks for OASIS to get its
> > act together (and it hasn't). Else we were planning on using
> > sourceforge. Not having CVS is very frustrating. What's the status on
> > resolving the IPR/legal issues (if any) wrt using sourceforge?
> >
> > -Anish
> > --
> >
> >
> > Patil, Sanjay wrote:
> > > The footer note in the pdf document reads - wsrm-1.1-wd-03.sxw
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sanjay
> >
>
