RE: [ws-rx-editors] Need to clean up the TC Document page

+1

  

  
  From: Marc Goodner 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, Oct 26, 2005 15:35 
  PM
To: Gilbert Pilz; Patil, Sanjay; 
  
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] Need 
  to clean up the TC Document page

  

  

  
They shouldn’t be 
  deleted. Moved is fine if it doesn’t impact the 
  url.

  
 

  
As far as convenience 
  to the TC members linking from the issue list directly to the draft is a lot 
  nicer for users than just giving them the long name and asking them parse out 
  the version/status info and go find it themselves. Believe me, I’m more than 
  happy not to do it as it makes less work for me. I don’t think the TC members 
  would be very happy with that approach though. I believe we were already asked 
  as a TC to provide the link to the exact version a proposal or issue pertains 
  to so not using that in the issue list might be frowned upon even further by 
  some of the members.

  
 

  

  

  
  

  
From: Gilbert 
  Pilz [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 3:13 
  PM
To: Marc Goodner; Patil, 
  Sanjay; 
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] Need to 
  clean up the TC Document page

  
 

  
I thought we could 
  delete files from Kavi? As it stands I don't think we should be linking from 
  the issues list into working drafts. If an issue or proposal needs to refer to 
  a part of a working draft it should do so by doc identifier (i.e. 
  wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06.pdf) and line number. The rule should be that, once the 
  editors publish a draft to the TC, they should never publish another version 
  of a draft with the same version number. As for issues and proposals that 
  refer to previous versions, perhaps we should scan the issues and action items 
  list for references to a version before we remove it from the Editors Drafts 
  folder?

  
 

  
Just thinking outloud 
  really . . . my goal is to make it really easy for everyone in the TC to find 
  the documents we want the to look at.

  
 

  
- 
  g

  
    
 

    

    
    

    
From: Marc 
    Goodner [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:46 
    PM
To: Patil, Sanjay; 
    Gilbert Pilz; 
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] Need to 
    clean up the TC Document page

    
Where would you 
    suppose the previous versions go? Moving them by copy and delete would have 
    a negative impact on links from places like the issue list. I’m afraid the 
    way Kavi works once you put something somewhere you need to leave 
    there.

    
 

    

    

    
    

    
From: 
    Patil, Sanjay [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:42 
    PM
To: Gilbert Pilz; 
    
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] Need to 
    clean up the TC Document page

    
 

    
 

    
I think it's a good 
    idea and we may not have to consult the TC just for deciding a folder for 
    the CDs. But can we wait until tomorrow which is when the ballot for CD 
    closes and CDs would be officially 
    born (hopefully).

    
 

    
Thanks, 
    sanjay

    
      
 

      

      
      

      
From: 
      Gilbert Pilz [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, Oct 26, 2005 14:32 
      PM
To: 
      
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] Need to 
      clean up the TC Document page

      

      
Not sure if this is an 
      "editors issue" or a "TC issue" but the TC Document page is getting kind 
      of crufty. Its hard to figure out which document is which when you look at 
      the page. Leaving the other folder aside for the moment, I think the 
      "Editors Drafts" folder should only contain the 
      following:

      

      
 

      

      
1.) latest WDs of wsrm and 
      wsrmp as published by the editors

      

      
2.) diffs of the lastest WD 
      against the previous document (WD or 
CD)

      

      
 

      

      
I think the Committee Drafts 
      should be placed in their own folder. This folder should 
      contain

      

      
 

      

      
1.) the latest CDs of wsrm and 
      wsrmp as approved by the TC

      

      
2.) diffs of the latest CD 
      against the previous CD or submission 
      document

      

      
 

      

      
Comments?

      

      
 

      

      
If we decide to do this, do we 
      need the TCs approval or can the chairs just ok 
      it?

      

      
 

      

      
- 
      g