Why is the WD date November 3rd?
I think that should be the date it gets sent to the TC, so either today or
tomorrow’s date.
The diff is not helpful at all. It doesn’t
track any of the changes from the section reorder.
As the guy who argued to apply the
editorial nits now I’m not going to quibble about eliminating double
spaces.
From: Gilbert Pilz
[mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005
8:40 PM
To: Gilbert Pilz;
Cc: Paul
Cotton
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors]
Publishing wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06
I've attached the files I'm going to
publish. If you review them you will notice that there are more changes flagged
than just those outlined in the resolution of i047. This is due to the fact
that I fixed one editorial nit (double spaces) before Doug convinced me that we
should stick to a strict interpretation of step (2) below. I know its a bit
confusing, but putting back a bunch of double spaces is both tedious and a
waste of time. Just consider it a preview of all the nits to come . . .
- g
From: Gilbert
Pilz
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005
2:04 PM
To:
Subject: [ws-rx-editors]
Publishing wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06
At the last F2F we agreed that we would do the following:
1.) publish the CD
2.) re-order the sub-sections per Doug's suggestion
3.) re-publish the new WD
Nobody said anything about making any other changes in step
(3). In the spirit of following the directions of the TC I think we should
publish wsrm-1.1-spec-wd06 (warts and all) and address the various editorial
flaws in wd-07.
The link to wd-06 is: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/download.php/15194/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06.sxw.
Doug has already looked this over and approved it. If I don't hear any
objections to doing so, I will publish this link (along with the diffs from
cd-01) to the main TC page some time late tonight.
- g
