Sounds like a good suggestion.
I looked at OO briefly, but it is not like Xinclude. It seems to me that
creating a master document and slave docs will be the other route (have
not tested my hypothesis whether this will completely work, just read
some docs :-D).
I prefer to keep schemas externally and include them in the docs just
before we go to publication manually.
--umit
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:]
> Sent: Monday, Dec 05, 2005 3:32 PM
> To: Anish Karmarkar; Doug Davis
> Cc:
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] wd07 ready?
>
>
> Good point. In other TCs I know of, the schema and wsdl files are
> maintained separately (outside of the spec) and they are combined only
> when a CD, PR, etc, is to be published. In any case, the
> primary driving
> factor for any decision in this regard is the editors
> preference, IMHO.
> So if there is something you guys prefer, we could bring it to the TC
> ...
>
> Thanks,
> Sanjay
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:]
> > Sent: Monday, Dec 05, 2005 15:24 PM
> > To: Doug Davis
> > Cc:
> > Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] wd07 ready?
> >
> > Thx!
> >
> > We should start thinking about having the schema/wsdl files
> available
> > online (separate from the doc as a text/xml or whatever
> media type).
> > This is a pain from an editing POV (as there are 2 copies of
> > the schema
> > -- is there an equivalent of #include or XML entities in OO
> > that would
> > solve this?).
> > But we will have to do this at some point.
> >
> > -Anish
> > --
> >
> > Doug Davis wrote:
> > >
> > > Anish - thanks! fixed.
> > > -Doug
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *Anish Karmarkar <>*
> > >
> > > 12/05/2005 02:48 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > To
> > > Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
> > > cc
> > >
> > > Subject
> > > Re: [ws-rx-editors] wd07 ready?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Doug,
> > >
> > > I reviewed it based on the diff file. Reviewed it for
> > changed content,
> > > format etc. Did not cross-check with the accepted
> resolutions. Found
> > > only two minor ed issues (all line numbers correspond to
> > the diff version):
> > >
> > > 1) Line 959: s/s:/xs:/
> > >
> > > 2) Line 982: s/x:/xs:/
> > >
> > > HTH.
> > >
> > > -Anish
> > > --
> > >
> > > Doug Davis wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I know its only 10am on the west coast but just a
> > reminder that we need
> > > > to post this to the TC today so I quick scan by others would be
> > > > appreciated.
> > > > -Doug
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS*
> > > >
> > > > 12/02/2005 07:54 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To
> > > >
> > > > cc
> > > >
> > > > Subject
> > > > [ws-rx-editors] wd07 ready?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I just uploaded the core spec wd07[1] and a pdf version
> > of it with all
> > > > change bars on[2].
> > > > Please review this when you get a chance. If all looks
> > good we can give
> > > > these to the TC.
> > > > thanks
> > > > -Doug
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/dow
> > nload.php/15737/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-07.pdf
> > >
> > > >
> > > > [2]
> > > >
> > >
> > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/dow
> > nload.php/15736/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-07-diff.pdf
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
