Yalcinalp, Umit wrote:
> Sounds like a good suggestion.
>
> I looked at OO briefly, but it is not like Xinclude. It seems to me that
> creating a master document and slave docs will be the other route (have
> not tested my hypothesis whether this will completely work, just read
> some docs :-D).
>
> I prefer to keep schemas externally and include them in the docs just
> before we go to publication manually.
>
Unless we find something similar to XML entities/#include, this seems
like a good way to go.
-Anish
--
> --umit
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:]
>>Sent: Monday, Dec 05, 2005 3:32 PM
>>To: Anish Karmarkar; Doug Davis
>>Cc:
>>Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] wd07 ready?
>>
>>
>>Good point. In other TCs I know of, the schema and wsdl files are
>>maintained separately (outside of the spec) and they are combined only
>>when a CD, PR, etc, is to be published. In any case, the
>>primary driving
>>factor for any decision in this regard is the editors
>>preference, IMHO.
>>So if there is something you guys prefer, we could bring it to the TC
>>...
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Sanjay
>>
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:]
>>>Sent: Monday, Dec 05, 2005 15:24 PM
>>>To: Doug Davis
>>>Cc:
>>>Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] wd07 ready?
>>>
>>>Thx!
>>>
>>>We should start thinking about having the schema/wsdl files
>>
>>available
>>
>>>online (separate from the doc as a text/xml or whatever
>>
>>media type).
>>
>>>This is a pain from an editing POV (as there are 2 copies of
>>>the schema
>>>-- is there an equivalent of #include or XML entities in OO
>>>that would
>>>solve this?).
>>>But we will have to do this at some point.
>>>
>>>-Anish
>>>--
>>>
>>>Doug Davis wrote:
>>>
>>>>Anish - thanks! fixed.
>>>>-Doug
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>*Anish Karmarkar <>*
>>>>
>>>>12/05/2005 02:48 PM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>To
>>>> Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
>>>>cc
>>>>
>>>>Subject
>>>> Re: [ws-rx-editors] wd07 ready?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Doug,
>>>>
>>>>I reviewed it based on the diff file. Reviewed it for
>>>
>>>changed content,
>>>
>>>>format etc. Did not cross-check with the accepted
>>
>>resolutions. Found
>>
>>>>only two minor ed issues (all line numbers correspond to
>>>
>>>the diff version):
>>>
>>>>1) Line 959: s/s:/xs:/
>>>>
>>>>2) Line 982: s/x:/xs:/
>>>>
>>>>HTH.
>>>>
>>>>-Anish
>>>>--
>>>>
>>>>Doug Davis wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > I know its only 10am on the west coast but just a
>>>
>>>reminder that we need
>>>
>>>> > to post this to the TC today so I quick scan by others would be
>>>> > appreciated.
>>>> > -Doug
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > *Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS*
>>>> >
>>>> > 12/02/2005 07:54 PM
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > To
>>>> >
>>>> > cc
>>>> >
>>>> > Subject
>>>> > [ws-rx-editors] wd07 ready?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > I just uploaded the core spec wd07[1] and a pdf version
>>>
>>>of it with all
>>>
>>>> > change bars on[2].
>>>> > Please review this when you get a chance. If all looks
>>>
>>>good we can give
>>>
>>>> > these to the TC.
>>>> > thanks
>>>> > -Doug
>>>> >
>>>> > [1]
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/dow
>>>nload.php/15737/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-07.pdf
>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > [2]
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/dow
>>>nload.php/15736/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-07-diff.pdf
>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
