RE: [ws-rx-editors] I am done with wsrmp docs.

From
Yalcinalp, Umit <>
Date
2005-12-09T20:56:43+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [ws-rx-editors] I am done with wsrmp docs.
Title: I am done with wsrmp docs.

It is hard to find. Everyone uses the perma URL via 
bookmarking and do not know which version the perma URL corresponds to, hence 
where to find the previous versions. 

 

Digging through the emails is an indirect and inefficient 
solution, just like trying to figure out the editors to do list. I am sorry but 
it does not scale. 

 

Could 
you at least provide a document table to access the revisions. 

 

Thanks, 

 

--umit

 

  

  
  From: Marc Goodner 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Friday, Dec 09, 2005 10:38 
  AM
To: Yalcinalp, Umit; 
  
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] I am 
  done with wsrmp docs. 

  

  

  
Every time I send 
  out the issue list update mail I also include the perma url for that version 
  so I’m surprised by the below comment that it is hard to find. The format is 
  simply append –nnn to the name of the file for the version you wish to get 
  to.

  
 

  

  
Marc 
  Goodner

  
Technical 
  Diplomat

  
Microsoft 
  Corporation

  
Tel: (425) 
  703-1903

  
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/mrgoodner/ 
  

  

  

  
  

  
From: 
  Yalcinalp, Umit [mailto:] 
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 12:21 
  PM
To: 
  
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] I am done with 
  wsrmp docs. 

  
 

  
I 
  fixed the date on the footer to reflect the current date when the doc was 
  edited. 

  
I 
  found only one issue wrt to the pending issues. In the editorial nits i072, we 
  were asked to remove the "." in the appendix sections. I left it as is as it 
  is created due to the style we use from OASIS. I don't think it is worth to 
  delay sending the specs to the tc for the present time. 
  

  
 

  
--umit 
  

  
PS. BTW, Marc where is the 
  revisions of the issue list? The list does not appear to be updated in the 
  tc's doc area and only the perma link is provided. 
  

  
This makes discussing the issue 
  list harder because revisions do not appear to be updated anymore and we are 
  only using the permalink. Therefore, I can not reliably say that a version of 
  the issues list at DateX had Issue  Y as pending if I were to look at the 
  Issues List again on DateZ where there may be additional Issues on the list, 
  or Issue Y status may be changed. 

  
Could you point us to it? 
  

  
This is why we urgently need an 
  editor's to do list! 
---------------------- 
  

  
Dr. Umit Yalcinalp 
  
Standards Architect 
  
NetWeaver Industry 
  Standards 
SAP Labs, LLC 
  
 
  
Tel: (650) 320-3095