RE: [ws-rx-editors] I am done with wsrmp docs.

From
Marc Goodner <>
Date
2005-12-09T22:03:56+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [ws-rx-editors] I am done with wsrmp docs.
Title: I am done with wsrmp docs.

Ever think to just try
this? http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/

 

 

Marc Goodner

Technical Diplomat

Microsoft Corporation

Tel: (425) 703-1903

Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/mrgoodner/

From: Yalcinalp, Umit
[mailto:] 

Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005
12:57 PM

To: Marc Goodner;


Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] I am
done with wsrmp docs. 

 

It is hard to find. Everyone uses the
perma URL via bookmarking and do not know which version the perma URL
corresponds to, hence where to find the previous versions. 

 

Digging through the emails is an indirect
and inefficient solution, just like trying to figure out the editors to do
list. I am sorry but it does not scale. 

 

Could you at least provide a document
table to access the revisions. 

 

Thanks, 

 

--umit

 

 

From: Marc Goodner
[mailto:] 

Sent: Friday, Dec 09, 2005 10:38
AM

To: Yalcinalp, Umit;


Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] I am
done with wsrmp docs. 

Every time I send out
the issue list update mail I also include the perma url for that version so
I’m surprised by the below comment that it is hard to find. The format is
simply append –nnn to the name of the file for the version you wish to
get to.

 

Marc Goodner

Technical Diplomat

Microsoft Corporation

Tel: (425) 703-1903

Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/mrgoodner/

From: Yalcinalp, Umit
[mailto:] 

Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005
12:21 PM

To:


Subject: [ws-rx-editors] I am done
with wsrmp docs. 

 

I
fixed the date on the footer to reflect the current date when the doc was
edited. 

I
found only one issue wrt to the pending issues. In the editorial nits i072, we were
asked to remove the "." in the appendix sections. I left it as is as
it is created due to the style we use from OASIS. I don't think it is worth to
delay sending the specs to the tc for the present time. 

 

--umit

PS.
BTW, Marc where is the revisions of the issue list? The list does not appear to
be updated in the tc's doc area and only the perma link is provided. 

This
makes discussing the issue list harder because revisions do not appear to be
updated anymore and we are only using the permalink. Therefore, I can not
reliably say that a version of the issues list at DateX had Issue  Y as
pending if I were to look at the Issues List again on DateZ where there may be
additional Issues on the list, or Issue Y status may be changed. 

Could
you point us to it? 

This
is why we urgently need an editor's to do list! 

----------------------

Dr.
Umit Yalcinalp 

Standards
Architect 

NetWeaver
Industry Standards 

SAP
Labs, LLC 



Tel:
(650) 320-3095