Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [ws-rx-editors] I am done with wsrmp docs.
Title: I am done with wsrmp docs. No, I was not aware you were keeping them there. As the issues keeper, I was trying to get you to point to the rest of the editors team where the docs are. Finally I am glad that my question is answered. Thank you. --umit From: Marc Goodner [mailto:] Sent: Friday, Dec 09, 2005 2:04 PM To: Yalcinalp, Umit; Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] I am done with wsrmp docs. Ever think to just try this? http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ Marc Goodner Technical Diplomat Microsoft Corporation Tel: (425) 703-1903 Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/mrgoodner/ From: Yalcinalp, Umit [mailto:] Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 12:57 PM To: Marc Goodner; Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] I am done with wsrmp docs. It is hard to find. Everyone uses the perma URL via bookmarking and do not know which version the perma URL corresponds to, hence where to find the previous versions. Digging through the emails is an indirect and inefficient solution, just like trying to figure out the editors to do list. I am sorry but it does not scale. Could you at least provide a document table to access the revisions. Thanks, --umit From: Marc Goodner [mailto:] Sent: Friday, Dec 09, 2005 10:38 AM To: Yalcinalp, Umit; Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] I am done with wsrmp docs. Every time I send out the issue list update mail I also include the perma url for that version so I’m surprised by the below comment that it is hard to find. The format is simply append –nnn to the name of the file for the version you wish to get to. Marc Goodner Technical Diplomat Microsoft Corporation Tel: (425) 703-1903 Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/mrgoodner/ From: Yalcinalp, Umit [mailto:] Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 12:21 PM To: Subject: [ws-rx-editors] I am done with wsrmp docs. I fixed the date on the footer to reflect the current date when the doc was edited. I found only one issue wrt to the pending issues. In the editorial nits i072, we were asked to remove the "." in the appendix sections. I left it as is as it is created due to the style we use from OASIS. I don't think it is worth to delay sending the specs to the tc for the present time. --umit PS. BTW, Marc where is the revisions of the issue list? The list does not appear to be updated in the tc's doc area and only the perma link is provided. This makes discussing the issue list harder because revisions do not appear to be updated anymore and we are only using the permalink. Therefore, I can not reliably say that a version of the issues list at DateX had Issue Y as pending if I were to look at the Issues List again on DateZ where there may be additional Issues on the list, or Issue Y status may be changed. Could you point us to it? This is why we urgently need an editor's to do list! ---------------------- Dr. Umit Yalcinalp Standards Architect NetWeaver Industry Standards SAP Labs, LLC Tel: (650) 320-3095
Next in thread →
Next in month →