Title: OO version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)
I think we should all use the same version of OO. There may
be no issues with using different versions but using the same version removes
one source of potential problems.
I don't really care if we use 1.1.5 or if we use 2.0. I'm
willing to upgrade to 2.0 if/when the other editors so the same. Its not like I
have to pay for an upgrade license or anything . . .
- g
From: Winkler, Steve
[mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005
11:40 AM
To:
Subject:
[ws-rx-editors] OO version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)
Hi editors,
I made a detailed pass over the document this
weekend to fix up editorial issues. I tried to limit myself explicitly
to issues I deemed editorial, and will send around a red line doc showing the
diffs so that the editors can agree to the changes before I submit them.
The point of this mail is that when I tried to do
the diff to send it out right now, I was unable to do so effectively because I
apparently have a newer version of Open Office installed than the rest of you.
OO 2.0 [1] was released in October, and I was curious what the editors thought
about upgrading to the newly released version.
In the meantime, I'm currently installing the 1.1.5
version that Gil mentioned he is using so that I can produce the
aforementioned diff.
This is just a general pulse check: What versions
are editors using now, and what do the editors think about upgrading to the
2.0 version of Open Office?
Cheers,
Steve
[1] http://www.openoffice.org/press/2.0/press_release.html
