RE: [ws-rx-editors] OO version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)

From
Winkler, Steve <>
Date
2005-12-14T00:11:15+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [ws-rx-editors] OO version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)
Title: OO version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)

 

If we agree that we should all use the same version, 
then I would say the question boils down to whether we should use 1.1.5 or 
2.0.  I'm always in favor of using the latest version as long as it's 
stable.

 

-Steve

 

 

From: Yalcinalp, Umit 
Sent: Tuesday, 
Dec 13, 2005 14:21 PM
To: Gilbert Pilz; Winkler, Steve; 

Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] OO 
version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)

I have been using 1.1.4. 

 

I care about a stable version that I do not need to chase 
bugs. If 1.1.5 is stable enough, I see no reason why we should not move to that. 

 

--umit

 

  

  
  From: Gilbert Pilz 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Tuesday, Dec 13, 2005 12:02 
  PM
To: Winkler, Steve; 
  
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] OO 
  version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)

  

  
I think we should all use the same version of OO. There 
  may be no issues with using different versions but using the same version 
  removes one source of potential problems.

  
 

  
I don't really care if we use 1.1.5 or if we use 2.0. I'm 
  willing to upgrade to 2.0 if/when the other editors so the same. Its not like 
  I have to pay for an upgrade license or anything . . .

  
 

  
- g

  
    

    
    From: Winkler, Steve 
    [mailto:] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 
    11:40 AM
To: 
Subject: 
    [ws-rx-editors] OO version for editors (2.0 or 1.1.5)

    

    
Hi editors, 

    
I made a detailed pass over the document this 
    weekend to fix up editorial issues.  I tried to limit myself explicitly 
    to issues I deemed editorial, and will send around a red line doc showing 
    the diffs so that the editors can agree to the changes before I submit 
    them.  

    
The point of this mail is that when I tried to do 
    the diff to send it out right now, I was unable to do so effectively because 
    I apparently have a newer version of Open Office installed than the rest of 
    you. OO 2.0 [1] was released in October, and I was curious what the editors 
    thought about upgrading to the newly released version.  

    
In the meantime, I'm currently installing the 
    1.1.5 version that Gil mentioned he is using so that I can produce the 
    aforementioned diff.  

    
This is just a general pulse check: What versions 
    are editors using now, and what do the editors think about upgrading to the 
    2.0 version of Open Office?

    
Cheers,
Steve  

    
[1] http://www.openoffice.org/press/2.0/press_release.html