RE: [ws-rx-editors] RDDL rough draft

Title: RDDL rough draft

 

Those changes are fine with me.  I grabbed the 
original URIs from the examples I mentioned in the first mail, as you had 
suspected. 

 

Cheers,

Steve

From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:] 

Sent: Tuesday, Dec 13, 2005 13:31 PM
To: 

Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] RDDL 
rough draft

Attached is the latest version of the RDDL. Unless I 
hear some objections, this is the version I will present to the TC 
tomorrow.

 

The only significant change is the use of the http://www.rddl.org/ domain to describe the purposes of the related 
resources. I prefer this to the http://www.w3.org URIs because http://www.rddl.org/purposes actually 
resolves to a description of RDDL purposes whereas http://www.w3.org/2005/11/rddl/purposes doesn't 
resolve to anything.

 

I also see a problem with using a single RDDL 
document to contain descriptions of both the WS-RM and WS-RM Policy namespaces. 
When we add the links to the relevant schema we are, of course, going to have 
two links. Both of these links will have a "nature" of http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema 
and a "purpose" of http://www.rddl.org/purposes/#schema-validation. If I'm a stupid piece of software and I'm trying 
to hunt down the schema for "xmlns:rm=http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200510", how 
do I disambiguate between the link to the WS-RM schema and the link to the WS-RM 
Policy schema? Obviously I could path-match the "href" attribute of the two link 
elements against my schema URI but, remember, I am a stupid 
piece of software.

 

- g