Dunno. The template shows a "day"
portion of the date so I assumed they wanted it. But if Mary says
otherwise I'm ok with just saying "April" and avoid the joke
:-)
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 |
"Patil, Sanjay"
<>
03/21/2007 11:22 AM
To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <>
cc
Subject
RE: [ws-rx-editors] CD9
Do we really need exact date on
the specs? Wouldn't specifying month and year be sufficient?
-- Sanjay
From: Doug Davis [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, Mar 21, 2007 4:37 AM
To:
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] CD9
All,
in prep for any changes from the policy discussions I created a
CD9 folder and uploaded all of the latest files into it. Someone
noticed that the xsd in the doc file had a typo - it was missing a 's="unbounded"'
on a "maxOccur" line. The actual xsd file itself
was fine. So, I increased the version # on just the WSRMP doc file
and fixed this one line.
Not wanting to exceed my limitations as a monkey I didn't update
the date on the files but I suspect they should all be set to April 1st
( coincidence? :-) . Any comments on this one?
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 |
