RE: [ws-rx-editors] CD9

Yes. Please refer to the templates. 
docs.oasis-open.org/templates/ 

 

The date to be displayed on any version of a specification 
is either the date the draft was produced (in the case of working drafts) or the 
date of approval by the TC (Committee Drafts, Committee Specs, OASIS Standards). 
Unless the TC is meeting on Sunday, 1 April shouldn't actually appear on any 
specs.

 

Mary

  

  
  From: Patil, Sanjay 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 11:23 
  AM
To: Doug Davis; 
  
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] 
  CD9

  

  
Do we really need exact date on the specs? Wouldn't 
  specifying month and year be sufficient?

  
-- Sanjay

  
    

    
    From: Doug Davis [mailto:] 
    
Sent: Wednesday, Mar 21, 2007 4:37 AM
To: 
    
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] 
    CD9

    

All, 
  in prep for any changes from the policy 
    discussions I created a CD9 folder and uploaded all of the latest files into 
    it.  Someone noticed that the xsd in the doc file had a typo - it was 
    missing a  's="unbounded"'  on a "maxOccur" line.  The actual 
    xsd file itself was fine.  So, I increased the version # on just the 
    WSRMP doc file and fixed this one line. 

  Not wanting to exceed my limitations as a monkey I didn't 
    update the date on the files but I suspect they should all be set to April 
    1st ( coincidence? :-) .  Any comments on this one? 

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM 
     |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software 
    Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |