RX nits

Couple of things I wanted to mention
as I was preparing a draft with Marc's proposal:

- I'm updating the dates to be April
5th

- I put Marc's text in a slightly different
spot than his proposal - as I think it makes more sense to have it in the
Namespace section to explain why 'wsp' isn't in the table.  Is this
ok with people? If so, I'll send a note to the RX list with this proposed
change.

- Robin, a while ago, noticed that the
WSRMP spec doesn't have a space between "Reliable" and "Messaging"
in the title - while the RM spec itself does.  Figured I'd add that
space.

- The references in the specs refer
to the RM specs as "Committee Drafts".  Mary - will
it be against OASIS policy to change those to "Committee Specifications"
if/when we approve them as CSs?  I know it not part of the 'approved
list' of edits after a CS vote.

I've attached the specs to this note
so people can review my edits - please look over everything!  :-)

thanks

-Doug

______________________________________________________

STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group

(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  
wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-09.doc

wsmc-1.0-spec-cd-05.doc

wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-08.doc