Doug,
I think there is one (I guess minor) correction
due:
First sentence under the Status section reads: This document was last revised or approved by the WS-RX on the
above date.
I
think we need to add "Technical Committee" after
"WS-RX".
--
Sanjay
From: Doug Davis [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, Mar 22, 2007 8:47 AM
To:
Cc:
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] RX
nits
Couple of things I wanted to
mention as I was preparing a draft with Marc's proposal:
- I'm updating the dates to be April 5th
- I put Marc's text in a slightly different
spot than his proposal - as I think it makes more sense to have it in the
Namespace section to explain why 'wsp' isn't in the table. Is this ok
with people? If so, I'll send a note to the RX list with this proposed
change.
- Robin, a while ago, noticed
that the WSRMP spec doesn't have a space between "Reliable" and "Messaging" in
the title - while the RM spec itself does. Figured I'd add that
space.
- The references in the specs
refer to the RM specs as "Committee Drafts". Mary - will it be
against OASIS policy to change those to "Committee Specifications" if/when we
approve them as CSs? I know it not part of the 'approved list' of edits
after a CS vote.
I've attached the
specs to this note so people can review my edits - please look over
everything! :-)
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM
| Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919)
254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 |
