Fixed in the version w/Marc edits. Will
check it in soon.
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 |
"Patil, Sanjay"
<>
03/22/2007 05:34 PM
To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <>
cc
<>
Subject
RE: [ws-rx-editors] RX nits
Doug,
I think there is one (I guess
minor) correction due:
First sentence under the Status
section reads: This document was last
revised or approved by the WS-RX on the above date.
I think we need to add "Technical
Committee" after "WS-RX".
-- Sanjay
From: Doug Davis [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, Mar 22, 2007 8:47 AM
To:
Cc:
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] RX nits
Couple of things I wanted to mention as I was preparing a draft with Marc's
proposal:
- I'm updating the dates to be April 5th
- I put Marc's text in a slightly different spot than his proposal - as
I think it makes more sense to have it in the Namespace section to explain
why 'wsp' isn't in the table. Is this ok with people? If so, I'll
send a note to the RX list with this proposed change.
- Robin, a while ago, noticed that the WSRMP spec doesn't have a space
between "Reliable" and "Messaging" in the title - while
the RM spec itself does. Figured I'd add that space.
- The references in the specs refer to the RM specs as "Committee
Drafts". Mary - will it be against OASIS policy to change
those to "Committee Specifications" if/when we approve them as
CSs? I know it not part of the 'approved list' of edits after a CS
vote.
I've attached the specs to this note so people can review my edits - please
look over everything! :-)
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 |
