+1 to preserving the names as they are.
Cheers,
Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email:
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295
"Gilbert Pilz" <> wrote on 07/14/2005 12:15:29 AM:
> Title: Document Names
> Description: Should the ?names? of the normative documents remain the
same as the submission
> documents or should they be changed? This issue applies to both
WS-ReliableMessaging and WS-RM Policy.
> Justification: The ?name? of a document effects a number of things such
as the document
> identifier, URIs etc.
> Target: core, policy
> Type: editorial
> Proposal: Preserve the name of the documents as submitted. Changing the
names would increase
> confusion (already at a high level) around ?OASIS and RM? and result in
extra effort. There does
> not seem to be any reasons for changing the names forcefull enough to
override these concerns.
> Therefore the names of the normative documents should be ?Web Services
Reliable Messaging Protocol
> (WS-ReliableMessaging)? and ?Web Services Reliable Messaging Policy
Assertion (WS-RM Policy)?
